Underground Hypnosis Reviews

Underground Hypnosis - Taylor Star At Its Worst!

2008-02-13T09:37:00.000-08:00

Note: THIS IS NOT A PAID/AFFILIATE REVIEW OF UNDERGROUND HYPNOSIS

Well I was recently asked to review this course, not that I am an authority on the subject, but if you have read through my other posts then you would know that I know!

The Internet is filled with reviews of products that are basically advertisements so it becomes really hard to find any real information about any product.

So what is Underground Hypnosis By Taylor Star All About?

Well, I would say its an easy way of picking money of people who think they can change their lives overnight without any hard work. The website does not allows you to enter without giving your email address (read that as spam acceptance) and all you find out there is claims that the website will be taken in down in few hours and how thousands of people are waiting to get their hands on this stuff. Well these tricks are now so old that it made me Yawn! Check out the website, it would be still there - I bet!

Anyhow, the course is a combination of NLP, mind techniques, seduction but the material itself is half baked cake. I must say, I don't know anything about Taylor Star, he does not holds the kind of reputation as Igor Ledochowksi in current time. I expected something like Conversational Hypnosis or at least something that looks worth the money but it is not. Infact I was quite disappointed with the entire stuff.

If you are serious about changing your life, or about learning hypnosis then conversational hypnosis should be your choice. Don't waste a penny on Underground Hypnosis, I am sure you will be running for refund within a matter of hours.

If you wish to learn more about Conversational Hypnosis then this is the official site: http://www.conversational-hypnosis.com

Favored Sensory Channels

2008-01-17T07:26:00.000-08:00

Most people have a favored sensory channel—a preferred sense for processing their thoughts. Again, let me say that all people use all senses available to them but do tend to have a dominant or favorite one.
If a person’s favored sensory channel is the visual channel, then they rely on that channel to process the majority of their thoughts. Seeing pictures in their head is how they “make sense” of their world. This is “normal” for them. This is natural for them. This is comfortable for
them.

If you talk using words that “speak to” the visual channel (see, look, picture, clear, bright, big, etc.) your subject will easily and readily process the information you are offering. You are “speaking their language”. You are talking in terms which they automatically understand.
If, however, you speak using words that are auditory channel oriented, you will make your subject experience their internal reality differently. Using auditory words makes a visually oriented person think differently—in a way they are not accustomed to. What this does is induce an instantaneous altered state.

Any state that is common or ordinary is “normal”—such as when they process information “their way”. If you cause them to process information in a manner inconsistent with what is normal, for them, you cause them to enter an altered state. By definition, an “altered state” is any state altered from their normal state of consciousness. By switching from one sensory channel to another, you cause your subject to go inside their mind and think in a way they are not accustomed to. By continuing to speak using a sensory channel your subject does not normally/regularly use, you are altering their internal experience.
Very often this causes the subject to become internally focused and absorbed in your story. This state of internal focus and absorption is exactly what you want to occur.
If you use the repackaging sensory input technique while telling a long, meandering organized multiple story, very often you will see your subject’s eyes glaze over as they become absorbed in your tale. This glazed eye look is evidence of internal focus and absorption, commonly known as daydreaming or being lost in one’s thoughts. Of course, you are directing that daydream and surreptitiously guiding their thoughts.

Covert Hypnosis

2008-01-15T10:04:00.000-08:00

Where traditional approaches to hypnosis often use fixed techniques, rigid models and susceptibility scales to induce trance states, Covert Hypnosis teaches you to customize your hypnotic induction to the unique human being you are hypnotizing. Any every human being is unique. That’s why, when you use Covert Hypnosis methods, every single induction will be
different—specific to the person you are hypnotizing. Don’t be concerned that you will need to learn thousands of different inductions, because you won’t. You will learn a handful of very powerful tools that you will pick and choose from with each person you hypnotize. Each tool can be used in different ways. You will learn how to use each tool and when. Covert Hypnosis grows from the roots of Ericksonian-style approaches.

Covert Hypnosis is different from indirect hypnosis in the crucial aspect that Covert Hypnosis is intentionally surreptitious. Most practitioners of indirect hypnosis do not keep it a secret that they are attempting to hypnotize their subject. Therefore, the use of indirect hypnosis
has usually been in a clinical setting with a subject who wants to be hypnotized and who is aware they are going to be hypnotized. The purpose of using indirect approaches is usually to decrease or bypass resistance to the traditional methods of trance induction. With Covert Hypnosis, your subject is not aware of your hypnotic techniques.

If you want to learn Covert Hypnosis, I suggest try Conversational Hypnosis By Igor Ledochowski.

What Is Covert Hypnosis

2007-12-10T10:07:00.000-08:00

C onversational Model
O rganized Multiple Stories
V erbal-Breathing Synchronization
E ncrypted Instructions
R epackaging Sensory Input
T rigger Post-Hypnotic Instructions

I hope you don't forget it now!

What is hypnosis?

2007-11-10T08:01:00.000-08:00

If you look up the word hypnosis in the dictionary you will read something along the lines of “a sleep-like state”, or “to be in a state that resembles sleep”. Most hypnotists though will disagree with the contention that hypnosis has anything to do with sleep. Many hypnotists will
tell you that hypnosis is the opposite of sleep, a heightened state of acute awareness.

Some hypnotists have talked about hypnosis as “an altered state of consciousness”, or “a state that is neither full consciousness nor full unconsciousness”. These are very vague descriptions of a state that has no agreed upon definition. The problem, of course is that if you
can’t define it, how do you know when it is or is not present?

“The Amazing Kreskin” has a definition of hypnosis that is, in my opinion, is the best one to come along yet. Kreskin has said that hypnosis does not exist--that its existence is a myth. In his book Secrets of the Amazing Kreskin, he states, “hypnosis is persuasion to accept a suggestion”. That is a very insightful, well thought out and accurate definition. What I believe
Kreskin means by that definition is that the “trance state” often believed to be associated with “hypnosis” is in fact completely separate from hypnosis, and has nothing to do with hypnosis. In other words, when a person is “hypnotized” they are simply following your suggestions. You
have persuaded them to do what you say.